Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 09:58:36 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), hackers@FreeBSD.org, isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BSD networking code guru needed? Message-ID: <4818.819536316@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 21 Dec 1995 09:20:29 %2B0100." <199512210820.JAA14345@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As Nate Williams wrote: > > > > What *should* happen is the incomplete arp entry and route should be > > removed from the tables and replaced with the now valid proxy-arp entry. > > I've been noticing this yesterday, too. Garrett solved the problem > for the non proxy-arp case right before 2.1 (where a clone route has > been allocated through the default route, pointing to the ethernet > interface), but this one here is still broken. Anyway, the location > where the clone routes are being killed might be a good spot to check > for the ARP stuff. I have seen the same kind of trouble with arp, ipfw and routed. Basically packets would go another way that what "netstat -rna" would make you think. Sometimes I could clear the trouble by zapping all arp-entries. I stopped using routed and made static routes, and have had no problems since. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4818.819536316>