Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:04:58 +0400 From: Igor Pokrovsky <ip@doom.homeunix.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> Subject: Re: linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works) Message-ID: <20051016170458.GA926@doom.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <200510161835.54216.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <82117273F2B3D8076639D8D3@palle.girgensohn.se> <200510142149.54931.lofi@freebsd.org> <20051016070643.GA379@doom.homeunix.org> <200510161835.54216.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > > > Still, isn't it strange that the kerberos libs don't have any > > > > > dependencies registered? A quick check shows that they are almost the > > > > > only libs in /usr/lib that have zero output from ldd. > > > > > > > > Probably they are statically linked. > > > > > > No, static libraries don't come with an .so extension. :-) > > > > No, you missed my point. I mean that kerberos libs are dynamic but > > linked against other libraries statically. > > If they were, there would be no problem in the first place. Sorry, it seems I missed a part of the thread. -ip -- The love letter you finally got the courage to send will be delayed in the mail long enough for you to make a fool of yourself in person.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051016170458.GA926>