Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:48:24 -0800 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need help for DSDT for an Epox Amd64 MB Message-ID: <43D54F28.8080205@root.org> In-Reply-To: <200601231909.02998.joao@matik.com.br> References: <200601201851.26858.joao@matik.com.br> <200601231644.22126.joao@matik.com.br> <43D524FB.4050001@root.org> <200601231909.02998.joao@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
JoaoBR wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 16:48, Nate Lawson wrote: > > >>>>hint.acpi_tz.0.disabled="1" >>> >>>debug.acpi.disabled=thermal >>> >>> would be the same? >> >>Yes. The first version he gave is the generic driver disabling >>mechanism, the acpi version disables all subsystems related to the >>function. It may be redundant though at this point and we might >>consider removing it. > > > well, would you mind saying which one exactly you think of for removing? Thinking of removing debug.acpi.disabled since it is mostly redundant with the hint approach. But more investigation should be done before claiming that. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43D54F28.8080205>