From owner-freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 11:15:19 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFBF4D13AE for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 11:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCcnz4TNkz4qjj for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 11:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 99A514D14AB; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 11:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: xfce@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997124D0E56 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 11:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (vogon.madpilot.net [159.69.1.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DCcny1RVjz4qdP for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 11:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCcnx1G4Gz6dkB; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:15:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id W6Z4d68gs6p3; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:15:15 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: XFCE upgraded to 4.16 From: Guido Falsi To: Andrea Venturoli , xfce@freebsd.org References: <46a21428-a640-f895-0f3b-f44c09497bf5@madpilot.net> <747ecac6-6d60-6143-1ae1-47801299b59b@netfence.it> <1502a321-02c0-13e9-16b3-6f11da9de3af@madpilot.net> <47ede65d-817a-8d80-a582-660d43ac6ac3@andreaventuroli.it> <45c74d5a-909b-8905-6673-b340e1d976b4@netfence.it> <989cf919-245c-61f9-3091-b0933849093b@netfence.it> <2b8631d8-479b-15ee-1efd-cc4bffd14710@madpilot.net> <838b577f-eb40-2776-19d4-2fb5f71611b3@netfence.it> <3655b4f7-0012-424b-7aa6-1d85fa2e9021@madpilot.net> <5f8cf84b-2474-d822-3f47-e57adabe1d92@madpilot.net> <6bc1a88b-0455-93ff-10cc-91fe1b0dbc41@netfence.it> <27d29afb-7fa1-d1fb-d817-3cb3b296d92f@madpilot.net> Message-ID: <53e6db42-3032-45ef-6558-12a3077fb31c@madpilot.net> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 12:15:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <27d29afb-7fa1-d1fb-d817-3cb3b296d92f@madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DCcny1RVjz4qdP X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[159.69.1.99:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[madpilot.net:s=bjowvop61wgh]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[159.69.1.99:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[madpilot.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[madpilot.net,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[xfce] X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:15:19 -0000 On 09/01/21 12:14, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 09/01/21 12:09, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> On 1/8/21 8:42 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> ANyway, thinking about it, if the chflag errors are just warnings >>> like you say above, then setting a custom TMPDIR will not be needed >>> even with your setup. So there is no need for a warning anyway. >> >> Guido, you are losing sight with the heart of the problem, i.e. >> without TMPDIR, xfce4-appearance-settings tries to create a temporary >> directory in / (and obviously fails). >> This has nothing to do with where home is or what filesystem it's using. > > I've proposed a patch upstream to fix this where it should be fixed. > Depending on the existence of a variable and not having a sensible > default is an upstream bug. > > Ref: https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/xfce4-settings/-/merge_requests/41 Forgot to mention, I plan to integrate this patch in the ports tree, but I need to better test it before doing that. -- Guido Falsi