From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jul 1 22:47:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E5637B400 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 22:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com [216.145.48.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5444E43E0A for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 22:47:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mail-relay1.yahoo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A0D8B5B1; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 22:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D213E8A.B83A7D98@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 22:47:54 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell Cattelan Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/38672: ifconfig+alias References: <200207020200.g622073J081748@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Russell Cattelan wrote: > > The following reply was made to PR misc/38672; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Russell Cattelan > To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, phisto@mail.ru > Cc: > Subject: Re: misc/38672: ifconfig+alias > Date: 01 Jul 2002 20:56:24 -0500 > > I just hit this bug also... does anybody have a fix for it yet? > It seems to have showwn up someplace between 4.5 and 4.6 > > It appears something is being over checking if I create aliases > with different netmasks it works, but creating aliases > with the same netmask as an already existing ip fails. netmasks for aliases should all be 255.255.255.255: alias Establish an additional network address for this interface. This is sometimes useful when changing network numbers, and one wishes to accept packets addressed to the old interface. If the address is on the same subnet as the first network address for this interface, a non-conflicting netmask must be given. Usually 0xffffffff is most appropriate. The fact that this is being enforced is not a bug. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message