From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sun Mar 10 10:19:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD54152E8A5 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185B76F1D8 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2016.home.selasky.org (unknown [176.74.212.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D744C260209; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:18:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: USB stack getting confused To: Konstantin Belousov Cc: Warner Losh , FreeBSD Hackers , "O'Connor, Daniel" References: <3B29D870-41F9-46AF-B9F3-03106DEC417D@dons.net.au> <20190309152613.GM2492@kib.kiev.ua> <20190309162640.GN2492@kib.kiev.ua> <20190309192330.GO2492@kib.kiev.ua> <20190310094758.GP2492@kib.kiev.ua> From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <35f69493-4bbb-4142-b61a-3e90adc8777b@selasky.org> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:18:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190310094758.GP2492@kib.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 185B76F1D8 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.972,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:19:02 -0000 On 3/10/19 10:47 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> Yes, I can do that if destroy_dev() ensures that d_close is called for >> all open file handles once and only once before it returns. I think this >> is where the problem comes from. > See above. For d_close it is impossible, for cdevpriv dtr it is already > there by design. > Yes, cdevpriv_dtr will wait for the final close() from user-space unfortunately. Or am I mistaken? --HPS