From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 16:00:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8AD16A4D6 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:00:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B2943D31 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:00:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8MG0jBj088019 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:00:45 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8MG0jNF088018; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:00:45 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:00:45 GMT Message-Id: <200409221600.i8MG0jNF088018@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Henrik W Lund Subject: Re: kern/71714: Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) (BETA4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Henrik W Lund List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:00:45 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/71714; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Henrik W Lund To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, lsi@samtel.ru Cc: Subject: Re: kern/71714: Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' at line 83 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c (errno = 0) (BETA4) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:48:14 -0700 Running FreeBSD/amd64 5.3-BETA5 and I can confirm the problem. It seems not related to the building of the qt port, but rather to libpthread. Mozilla, for one, produces the same error message, as do some other builds as well. Libmapping pthread to libc_r is a workaround, but shouldn't this work for pthread too?