Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:48:30 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, keramida@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: docs/119463: [handbook] [patch] typo in printing/chapter.sgml Message-ID: <1031589748.20080115014830@rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <20080114155723.K26271@wonkity.com> References: <200801141342.m0EDgjCB069055@freefall.freebsd.org> <1200344044.478bcbecb1228@imp.free.fr> <20080114155723.K26271@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Warren, Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 12:02:32 AM, you wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr wrote: >> Quoting keramida@FreeBSD.org: >> >> >>> - <para>You should also specify the <literal>rw</literal> capability; >>> - that tells <application>LPD</application> to open the printer in >>> - read-write mode.</para> >>> + <para>You should also specify the <literal>rw</literal> capability. >>> + When this capability is present, <application>LPD</application> >>> + opens the printer in read-write mode.</para> >>> >>> Does this look better? >> >> I guess we should avoid the repetition of "capability", though (the fdp-primer, >> "writing style" invites us to). >> What do you think of something like: " When present, it tells LPD to open the >> printer in r/w mode". >> My, I'm starting to feel like a fussy guy, now... :-\ > <para>You should also include the <literal>rw</literal> capability so > <application>LPD</application> opens the printer in read-write mode. Maybe something like: <para>The <literal>rw</literal> capability should be also included in order to let <application>LPD</application> to open the printer in the read-write mode.</para> -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1031589748.20080115014830>