Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:08:10 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org>, Rong-En Fan <rafan@infor.org>, Marcus Grando <marcus@corp.grupos.com.br>, sem@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict Message-ID: <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:49:11AM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> So I'd like to suggest to rename the existing mail/policyd to
> mail/policyd-spf, for example. It might be a good idea to rename the
> new port to mail/policyd-somethingelse anyway, if we can come up with a
> sufficiently descriptive (and short!) "somethingelse" part.
I would call them
mail/postfix-policyd
mail/postfix-policyd-spf
But that is what you said already.
If there are getting more which just are described as postfix
"policyd" ports, just call them postfix-policyd-a, postfix-policyd-b
and so on.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050322090810.GY34807>