From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 27 06:39:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA25413 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Nov 1997 06:39:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA25408 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 1997 06:39:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA00549; Thu, 27 Nov 1997 06:42:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711271442.GAA00549@implode.root.com> To: Dave Marquardt cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adaptive scheduling In-reply-to: Your message of "26 Nov 1997 23:14:09 CST." <85g1oisyu6.fsf@localhost.zilker.net> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 06:42:44 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Charles Mott writes: >> It is not that difficult to schedule outgoing packets, but incoming >> traffic is difficult to control. In the case of tcp streams, one >> suggestion has been to rewrite the window value on the tcp packets so that >> holding back ACKs will slow down the incoming stream after about two >> packets or so. Additionally, it is possible to send icmp source quench >> packets to try to slow down external sources. I don't know that these >> mechanisms will work very well, though. > >Does FreeBSD do anything with the IP Type of Service bits? Yes, both telnet and ftp set the TOS as appropriate. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project