Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Aug 1999 16:10:50 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Jail syscalls 
Message-ID:  <199908032310.QAA01618@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Aug 1999 16:05:14 PDT." <199908032305.QAA24203@apollo.backplane.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>     Speaking of the jail() syscall -- it really needs to be revamped a 
>     little before people really start using it wholeheartedly.  The size
>     of the jail structure needs to be passed in the syscall to allow backwards
>     compatibility when things change such as, for example, the size of the
>     IP address.

Actually, with interfaces like this you should generally pass a pointer 
to the structure in userspace, and stick a version number constant in 
the beginning of the structure.  The size is often not enough of a 
determining factor...

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  msmith@cdrom.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908032310.QAA01618>