Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:03:46 -0800 From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> To: "Jonathon McKitrick" <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Microsoft service packs... (was many other threads...) Message-ID: <000001bf3264$9ac28160$021d85d1@youwant.to> In-Reply-To: <3834DDDF.DCA2119A@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm baffled. How did the merits of NT get into this? We were never even discussing whether NT was a good or bad server operating system. DS > Quote from a friend who is an NT admin... > In response to David's comments on NT 'advances' in Service Packs.... > > > This is nuts. > > > Anyway, I think NT is stable when it comes to programs, but when the > system goes down, it goes down hard. The other day, I installed a new > server, which had nothing on it but NT4.0 and service pack 4. The > company > came out to install the banks software, and it crashed (bug checked) > TWICE > just during the FILE COPY!!! I mean, come on. How the heck can you > norrow > down what caused that? > > No, the more I use NT, the more I hate it. Even from the very limited > use > of win2000, I think it will be much better. > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001bf3264$9ac28160$021d85d1>