Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:20:26 -0700 (MST) From: Chad David <davidc@guild.ab.ca> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java -> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: ... lockdflt.c:55 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001281218380.75457-100000@lodge.guild.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: <200001281827.KAA05467@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes this fixed it. Thanks. Chad On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote: > In article <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001271831060.73216-100000@lodge.guild.ab.ca>, > Chad David <davidc@guild.ab.ca> wrote: > > > > Since the ~Jan 25 I have been getting an error while > > running any java programs on 3.4-stable. I cvsup'd,and > > ran a make world this afternoon and it still fails. It doesn't > > always hit... about 50% of the time. > > > > The errors is: > > > > ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 > [...] > > FreeBSD stronghold.guild.ab.ca 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jan > > 27 17:04:43 MST 2000 > > I believe I fixed this one in -current 3 days ago, but I haven't > merged it into -stable yet. I would appreciate it if you would try > the patch below and let me know whether it clears up the problem for > you. > > John > > Index: lockdflt.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c,v > retrieving revision 1.3.2.1 > diff -u -r1.3.2.1 lockdflt.c > --- lockdflt.c 2000/01/21 02:31:50 1.3.2.1 > +++ lockdflt.c 2000/01/28 18:25:01 > @@ -28,10 +28,9 @@ > /* > * Default thread locking implementation for the dynamic linker. It > * is used until the client registers a different implementation with > - * dllockinit(). The default implementation does mutual exclusion > - * by blocking the SIGVTALRM, SIGPROF, and SIGALRM signals. This is > - * based on the observation that most userland thread packages use one > - * of these signals to support preemption. > + * dllockinit(). The default implementation does mutual exclusion by > + * blocking almost all signals. This is based on the observation that > + * most userland thread packages use signals to support preemption. > */ > > #include <dlfcn.h> > @@ -63,10 +62,13 @@ > > l = NEW(LockDflt); > l->depth = 0; > - sigemptyset(&l->lock_mask); > - sigaddset(&l->lock_mask, SIGVTALRM); > - sigaddset(&l->lock_mask, SIGPROF); > - sigaddset(&l->lock_mask, SIGALRM); > + sigfillset(&l->lock_mask); > + sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGTRAP); > + sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGABRT); > + sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGBUS); > + sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGSEGV); > + sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGKILL); > + sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGSTOP); > return l; > } > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001281218380.75457-100000>