From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 20 11: 3: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.kis.ru (post.kis.ru [195.98.32.206]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8105737B405; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from xkis.kis.ru ([195.98.32.200] verified) by post.kis.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2) with SMTP id 267249; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:02:58 +0300 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:02:58 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Valdov X-Sender: dv@xkis.kis.ru To: sos@freebsd.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: ATA driver feature request Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! Is it possible to do not disable UDMA-100 when there is UDMA-33 device at the some IDE cable? w2k works fine with this hardware configuration with ATA-100. FreeBSD limits both drives on the bus because there is 'non-ATA66 compliant cable'. I've an Intel motherboard D815EFV. Intel documentation for this board (FAQ section) says that it is possible to have ATA-100 and ATA-33 devices at the some IDE bus/cable. So, is it possible to make a kernel option to do not disable ATA-66/100 in such cases? May be it will be with a BIG warning, but present. Please. Dmitry. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message