From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 22:33:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35C31065679 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:33:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from emlpirnp0.waddell.com (emlpirnp0.waddell.com [67.130.252.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606FD8FC1C for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailhost2.waddell.com (HELO emlpfilt2.waddell.com) ([10.1.10.30]) by emlpirnp1.waddell.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2011 16:33:29 -0600 Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D50E6308003; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:33:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com (advphtcas0.wradvisors.com [192.168.203.228]) by emlpfilt2.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAB9308002; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:33:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.85]) by ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com ([192.168.203.228]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:33:29 -0600 From: Gary Gatten To: 'Adam Vande More' , Kees Jan Koster Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:33:28 -0600 Thread-Topic: Diagnosing packet loss Thread-Index: AcypZb8UoXF291hBQOeqzp25l0BL3wAAN7fw Message-ID: <17444_1322001209_4ECC2339_17444_66_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499D2C69D83@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <2973_1321996526_4ECC10EE_2973_123_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499D2C69D77@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <4B28ADC5-8325-442E-8F02-9AE3535D8C6D@gmail.com> <763864D4-CC19-4473-AFAF-D22EF94E08A2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Michael Sierchio , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Diagnosing packet loss X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:33:30 -0000 I noticed the Ethernet flow control is enabled - or seems to be? Perhaps D= ISABLE Ethernet flow control (rxpause/txpause) in your box AND the switch. ________________________________ From: Adam Vande More [mailto:amvandemore@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 4:26 PM To: Kees Jan Koster Cc: Michael Sierchio; Gary Gatten; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing packet loss On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kees Jan Koster > wrote: [kjkoster@saffron ~]$ ifconfig bge0 bge0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=3D8009b ether 00:e0:81:32:ed:b4 inet 91.196.169.165 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 91.196.169.167 inet 91.196.169.166 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 91.196.169.166 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active [kjkoster@saffron ~]$ fgrep bge0 /etc/rc.conf ifconfig_bge0=3D"inet 91.196.169.165 netmask 255.255.255.248" ifconfig_bge0_alias0=3D"91.196.169.166 netmask 255.255.255.255" That broadcast address and netmask look wrong for sure. Should I just change that to 255.255.255.248 as well? No, that is correct. Leave your alias alone if you want it to continue to = work. -- Adam Vande More
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system."