From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 22 07:32:36 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D003916A4CE
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 07:32:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from proxy.ddcom.co.jp (proxy.ddcom.co.jp [211.121.191.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 209F043D45
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 07:32:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rees@ddcom.co.jp)
Received: (qmail 9028 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2005 07:44:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO matthew) (10.10.10.11)
  by mail.ddcom.local with SMTP; 22 Apr 2005 07:44:39 -0000
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:32:38 +0900
From: Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-Id: <20050422162656.1995.REES@ddcom.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.06
Subject: mixing portupgrade with sysinstall safe?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 07:32:36 -0000

Really stupid question, I know. I just feel funny about using sysinstall
after doing a portupgrade.

Probably is not a good idea?

--
Joel Rees   <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
digitcom, inc.   株式会社デジコム
Kobe, Japan   +81-78-672-8800
** <http://www.ddcom.co.jp> **