Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:41:12 -0800 From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: switching bsdlabel's label Message-ID: <20090120174112.GS17567@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <d3ea75b30901200936n15ae0b03m4c48ba55f3728d44@mail.gmail.com> References: <d3ea75b30901200724o4bc9b515y71733fcb2f5808f9@mail.gmail.com> <20090120161355.GA28525@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <d3ea75b30901200936n15ae0b03m4c48ba55f3728d44@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--HL+2C3YiDdBCOf2R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:36:34PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > ... > > Why not simply use bsdlabel -e da0s1? >=20 > Because I didnt know about that? ;-) >=20 > Thank you for the hint. >=20 > However I still have the same doubt. Since basically its the same > task, Is it safe do relabel this way? I have done it several times without any problems. Do, however, ensure that your /etc/fstab entries match the result before you reboot; attempting a "mount" by hand (merely specifying either the mount point or the device, but not both) before your next reboot can serve as a useful reality check. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --HL+2C3YiDdBCOf2R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkl2DLgACgkQmprOCmdXAD01UgCfUwuVN3vG7ZQ1j3vAsEVYKGhU /AgAnA/Hf7EuHcWHIpJjYVQwd/+C24Xa =lnT/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HL+2C3YiDdBCOf2R--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090120174112.GS17567>