From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 18:17:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C97D10656F0 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF02D8FC2A for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0KHfCog080972; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:41:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0KHfCct080971; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:41:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:41:12 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: Eduardo Meyer Message-ID: <20090120174112.GS17567@albert.catwhisker.org> Mail-Followup-To: David Wolfskill , Eduardo Meyer , stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org References: <20090120161355.GA28525@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HL+2C3YiDdBCOf2R" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: switching bsdlabel's label X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:17:41 -0000 --HL+2C3YiDdBCOf2R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:36:34PM -0200, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > ... > > Why not simply use bsdlabel -e da0s1? >=20 > Because I didnt know about that? ;-) >=20 > Thank you for the hint. >=20 > However I still have the same doubt. Since basically its the same > task, Is it safe do relabel this way? I have done it several times without any problems. Do, however, ensure that your /etc/fstab entries match the result before you reboot; attempting a "mount" by hand (merely specifying either the mount point or the device, but not both) before your next reboot can serve as a useful reality check. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --HL+2C3YiDdBCOf2R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkl2DLgACgkQmprOCmdXAD01UgCfUwuVN3vG7ZQ1j3vAsEVYKGhU /AgAnA/Hf7EuHcWHIpJjYVQwd/+C24Xa =lnT/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HL+2C3YiDdBCOf2R--