From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 20 17:10:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655AF16A4CE; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:10:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810EC43D96; Fri, 20 May 2005 17:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4KHD8bl001515; Fri, 20 May 2005 11:13:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <428E19B0.6030001@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:09:04 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@freebsd.org References: <428B6FC1.3000907@fsn.hu> <1116437340.69035.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20050518180521.GB9719@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20050519010828.GA64608@dragon.NUXI.org> <428CC309.5040306@fsn.hu> <20050520165526.GE6982@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050520165526.GE6982@dragon.NUXI.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: Pav Lucistnik cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on dual core Opterons - stupid buildworld test X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:10:08 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 06:47:05PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote: > >>David O'Brien wrote: >> >>>I'm taking care of this. Please no one commit any AMD Dual-core related >>>patches (especially WRT HTT) with out passing them by me. >> >>Do you have any preliminary patches? Access to hardware? > > > Yes I have hardware - since March. > > Everyone should note that difference of dual-core vs. single core doesn't > matter one bit for FreeBSD. We don't have NUMA support, which is what is > required to care about the difference between 1x dual-core & 2x > single-core (or 2x dual-core & 4x single-core) Opteron. > > For 6.0-RELEASE (which branches June 1, 2005), I'm going to just have the > kernel ignore that dual-core Opteron sets the HTT feature flag. > Note, 6.0-RELEASE does not happen on June 1. That is the date where we shift out of crazy development mode and into polishing mode. Polishing would include making a CPU feature work correctly. Scott