Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 19:16:26 -0500 From: Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@goldmark.org> To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Time Synchronizing Between Two Servers Message-ID: <204A6323-4E2F-4806-9015-F223E4FDE993@goldmark.org> In-Reply-To: <20070508005350.45d53438@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <20070503014137.I3544@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <a969fbd10705021849g64f4752fobd5b6a817254ba28@mail.gmail.com> <20070503015723.S3544@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> <d7195cff0705022217k4f0aaf2fibd2bfeb97b6498c8@mail.gmail.com> <4639FAB6.9050701@mac.com> <20070504171053.41eddb6a@gumby.homeunix.com> <7967B2A8-3FF5-46AD-AFEA-9EE5C680A414@mac.com> <20070507230246.198b6608@gumby.homeunix.com.> <AC8B7666-7992-41B2-80B9-22ACC331A6BB@goldmark.org> <20070508005350.45d53438@gumby.homeunix.com.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 7, 2007, at 6:53 PM, RW wrote: > I was questioning the need for a low-drift system clock on a machine > that *is* running ntpd, not the need for ntpd. Ah, sorry. However, I was adding a somewhat pedantic point of distinguishing between "low drift" and "inconsistent drift". High but consistent drift is better than low but inconsistent drift. Anyway, jdow obviously knows much more about this than I do. So I will defer to her. Cheers, -j -- Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?204A6323-4E2F-4806-9015-F223E4FDE993>