Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 08:54:50 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> To: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64bit address space on alpha Message-ID: <00Mar13.085451est.115827@border.alcanet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20000312112132.A75380@cicely8.cicely.de>; from ticso@cicely.de on Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 09:22:58PM %2B1100 References: <19990718123721.A88813@cicely8.cicely.de> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907181540560.58023-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> <20000312112132.A75380@cicely8.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2000-Mar-12 21:22:58 +1100, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de> wrote: >I put (128*1024*1024*1024) in config following the example in LINT. >The point is that gcc uses an int to calculate the number behind. As would any other C compiler. (128*1024*1024*1024) is an expression comprising 4 int constants. According to the ANSI C rules, that means the expression should be evaluated as an int. If you stuck an `L' after one of the constants, the expression would be evaluated as `long'. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00Mar13.085451est.115827>