From owner-cvs-all  Wed Jul 15 20:09:12 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA02749
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 20:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA02735;
          Wed, 15 Jul 1998 20:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from bubble.didi.com (cs1c127.ppp.infoweb.or.jp [202.219.138.91]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA19501; Wed, 15 Jul 1998 20:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost)
	by bubble.didi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA18453;
	Thu, 16 Jul 1998 11:55:22 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from asami)
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 11:55:22 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199807160255.LAA18453@bubble.didi.com>
To: hsu@hub.freebsd.org
CC: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, eivind@yes.no, hsu@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <199807131958.MAA25546@hub.freebsd.org> (message from Jeffrey Hsu on Mon, 13 Jul 1998 12:58:44 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/dylan - Imported sources
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

 * I like that idea.  We'd have to host it on one of our machines of
 * course.  Before I go change it or keep it the same, anyone else
 * (like our portmeister) want to weigh in with an opinion?

Me?  Assuming I'm not sounding like an idiot (I'm seriously behind in
my mails), I agree.  It completely defeats the idea of ports.

Similar things have happened in the past (remember the uuencoded tcl
tarball), can there be a check added to cvs to make it harder to
import files larger than a certain size (say, 1MB)?

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message