Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:44:51 -0600 From: Chad David <davidc@acns.ab.ca> To: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@ns.aus.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tuning for samba Message-ID: <20020710184451.B43724@colnta.acns.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207111113340.4936-100000@ns.aus.com>; from rsharpe@ns.aus.com on Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:20:51AM %2B0930 References: <20020710180711.A43342@colnta.acns.ab.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207111113340.4936-100000@ns.aus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:20:51AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote: > > Certainly, a 2GB machine that I regularly test against does not notice the > smbds start up all that much. I have no real way of testing this type of load here, but first thing tomorrow morning I'll know.. > > > As a side note, the data being served will be attached to the samba server > > via NFS. > > Hmmm, some of the locking stuff might be an issue then ... This is my biggest concern. I just don't know what to tune here since the data just basically passes straight through the box, and the with about of data being served and the access patterns buffering is pointless. One thing I failed to mention, none of the clients ever write; the system is completely read only. Thanks. -- Chad David davidc@acns.ab.ca www.FreeBSD.org davidc@freebsd.org ACNS Inc. Calgary, Alberta Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020710184451.B43724>