Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:02:02 -0700
From:      Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        Omer Faruk Sen <omerfsen@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: zfs root partition boot?
Message-ID:  <ade45ae90902021602y4c2a9dbfr675d7e0805f47522@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090203004813.A3970@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90902021504v7508e753p2caed771ac82e4be@mail.gmail.com> <20090203004813.A3970@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:

> FreeBSD decides to kill ZFS support, you'll be stuck with a unbootable
>> disk.  I'd stick with the more mature, tested methods like gmirror or
>> gvinum.  Nothing beats a hardware raid though.
>>
> IMHO "hardware" RAID beats nothing. it's mostly crap.
>
> gmirror/gstripe/gconcat works well and always
>

Yes, each person will have their own unique view.  To dismiss or put down
someone else's view seems unrational

There are times I prefer software raid, there are times I prefer hardware
raid, neither of which will solve 100% of the problems 100% of the time.


My point still stands that **IF** FreeBSD decides to kill ZFS support,
you'll be SOL.




And quote the source PROPERLY next time.  The 2 letter word you DID NOT
quote me on makes a difference in the point I was making.

If you want to exchange flames, remove the -questions email list from the
recipients.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ade45ae90902021602y4c2a9dbfr675d7e0805f47522>