Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:44:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Tuomo Valkonen <tuomov@iki.fi> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ion3 license violation Message-ID: <slrnflv7r5.k6f.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> References: <slrnflv329.e47.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> <20071212073944.GC29211@soaustin.net> <slrnflv4hj.ge8.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> <20071212080932.GA30438@soaustin.net> <slrnflv6nd.k6f.tuomov@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> <20071212083658.GA31114@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-12-12, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > No, the release packages were already built. You see, part of > the problem of software Quality Assurance is that it takes some Distro Quality Assurance... ROTFLMAO. I have fixed numerous bugs since 20070927 was released. What have you done? I bet there has been _zero_ "quality assurance" done by you (Frisbee) wrt. Ion3. No, you just throw it in, freeze it, and call that "quality assurance", and then expect the authors to deal with the users using the buggy releases that you distribute, and that the authors themselves have fixed ages ago in their real quality assurance -- the RC stage. The distros don't even bother checking whether the software is in "development snapshot" stage -- the still distribute megafrozen snapshots without prominently mentioning this. That's distro "quality assurance" for you. > your software will descend even further into complete irrelevance. That's quite appropriate, since FOSS has become completely irrelevant to me. Windows is simply the better OS nowadays. -- Tuomo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnflv7r5.k6f.tuomov>