Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:10:37 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/devfs devfs_vnops.c src/sys/kern kern_conf.c src/sys/sys conf.h Message-ID: <18954.1124298637@phk.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:04:37 PDT." <43036E25.6010508@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <43036E25.6010508@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes: >Is it guaranteed that prep_cdevsw() won't be called twice without a call >to fini_cdevsw()? Otherwise, the shadow cdevsw could leak when its >pointer is set to NULL. I'm not familiar with this code, just asking. There's a flag that prevents controls the call to prep_ -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18954.1124298637>