From owner-freebsd-sparc Mon Dec 14 12:59:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA11354 for freebsd-sparc-outgoing; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 12:59:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hillbilly.hayseed.net (dnai-207-181-249-194.dsl.dnai.com [207.181.249.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA11349 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 12:59:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from enkhyl@scient.com) Received: from localhost (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hillbilly.hayseed.net (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA22822; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 12:59:25 -0800 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 12:59:23 -0800 (PST) From: Christopher Nielsen X-Sender: enkhyl@ender.sf.scient.com Reply-To: Christopher Nielsen To: Alfred Perlstein cc: Paolo Di Francesco , freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Experiments... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > At home, i will upload our patches to the site mentioned above. Sounds good. I'll grab Kapil's stuff (I may already have it). > I understand you are using egcs-current? it is essential that we use the > same toolchain, i think i will get the latest snap tonight and hope for > the best. (we really need the sparc bits that are in the -current snap) Yes, I'm using egcs-current (trying to make room for their cvs tree on my current machine, so I can track it better). After Jordan's recommendation to use egcs, I started poking around through mail archives and the egcs stuff, and came to the same conclusion about needing the sparc bits in egcs-current. -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The eBusiness Systems Innovator cnielsen@scient.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message