From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 13 10:13:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9471C942 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463EF18EA for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 768B96B3CB9 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:41:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-185-246.41-151.net24.it [151.41.246.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rBD9f6cs052952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:41:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-185-246.41-151.net24.it [151.41.246.185] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rBD9f0Qk015196 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:41:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <52AAD62C.6090300@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:41:00 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] boost 1.55.0 References: <20131213084707.GC52736@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20131213084707.GC52736@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:41:07 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Score: 5.177 (*****) BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT, RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:13:05 -0000 On 12/13/13 09:47, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > It uses a modern compiler (sorry I haven't been able to make it use gcc from > base at all, so it uses clang33 or gcc47+ from ports on FreeBSD 9.1 and FreeBSD > 8.*, clang33 from base in FreeBSD 9.2 (if available) and cc on 10+) Hello. Thanks for the work... however I have a (hopefully quick) question: does this mean I can't mix this with other ports which use a different compiler? I.e. Can I link against boost (compiled with clang33 or gcc47+) and against port XYZ (compiled with base gcc)? Does this mean I have to compile XYZ with clang33/gcc47+ too? So it would mean I'll need to compile XYZ's dependencies with clang33/gcc47+ and other ports depending on those dependencies with clang33/gcc47+ and so on? bye & Thanks av.