Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:25:29 +0100
From:      "Rene Ladan" <r.c.ladan@gmail.com>
To:        Ighighi <ighighi@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Referencing older entries in ports/UPDATING may be bad practice
Message-ID:  <e890cae60803270625n36af1c0aia136ff3074666285@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <47EB8779.8070304@gmail.com>
References:  <47EB8779.8070304@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2008/3/27, Ighighi <ighighi@gmail.com>:
> Referencing old entries in ports/UPDATING that contain the commands,
>  options, etc. isn't completely safe because those options may change.
>
>  In the case of portupgrade(1), at the following options changed between
>  pkgtools-2.0.1 and pkgtools-2.4.3:
>
>  2.0.1:
>       -c
>       --clean          Do ``make clean'' before each build.  This is the
>                        default behavior.  See the -w option below.
>
>       -C
>       --cleanup        Do ``make clean'' after each installation.  This
>                        is the default behavior.  See the -W option below.
>
>       -q
>       --noconfig       Do not read the configuration file -
>                        $PREFIX/etc/pkgtools.conf.
>
>
>
>  2.4.3:
>       -c
>       --config         Run ``make config-conditional'' before everything
>                        for all tasks.  -w option below.
>
>       -C
>       --force-config   Run ``make config'' before everything for all
>                        tasks.
>
>       -q
>       --quiet          Do not display a message when -N specified and
>                        there is already installed package.
>
This particular example looks more like a POLA violation of pkgtools.

>  It doesn't bite to make each entry a little bit more "self-contained"
>  at least when it comes to the sequence of commands to be run. Though
>  I haven't yet found a single issue with current practice, it's better
>  to feel safe than to worry at the possibility, excuse me if it's just
>  me ;)  Safe for users and developers alike.

I do remember a discussion in which the 20070519 entry (X.org 7.2)
turned out to be outdated.

Regards,
Rene
-- 
http://www.rene-ladan.nl/

GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0  4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6
(subkeys.pgp.net)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e890cae60803270625n36af1c0aia136ff3074666285>