From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Feb 26  9: 0: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC63B37B4EC
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:00:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1QH04006578;
	Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:00:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:00:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200102261700.f1QH04006578@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Takeshi Hiyama <th@cis.ibaraki.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: ports/24767: usage of WANT_GNOME is mistaken in 
 ports/games/xpuyopuyo
Reply-To: Takeshi Hiyama <th@cis.ibaraki.ac.jp>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/24767; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Takeshi Hiyama <th@cis.ibaraki.ac.jp>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, th@cis.ibaraki.ac.jp
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/24767: usage of WANT_GNOME is mistaken in 
 ports/games/xpuyopuyo
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 01:50:21 +0900

 >This works in later versions of this port (and ports tree).  Please 
 >update this port and grab the upgrade kit if you are still using 4.0. 
 >Thanks. 
 
 No, I meant that this port is not using WANT_GNOME correct way,
 I'm using current ports tree.
 WANT_GNOME is defined in *inside* of ".if defined(HAVE_GNOME) ...
 .endif".
 I think WANT_GNOME must be defined whether someone have,
 or don't have gnome, is this wrong?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message