Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:20:33 +0200 From: Achim Patzner <ap@bnc.net> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: securelevel and ipfw zero Message-ID: <19990727222033.A75086@bnc.net> In-Reply-To: <199907271959.NAA27155@mt.sri.com>; from Nate Williams on Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 01:59:58PM -0600 References: <199907271951.NAA27049@mt.sri.com> <199907271956.OAA13811@aurora.sol.net> <199907271959.NAA27155@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'd like to see people other than you, I, and Matt discussing this. > Other people who use this feature of IPFW that have an opinion one way > or the other should speak up. I must admit being a bad boy - I'm using ipfw for firewalling and accounting: "log" rules for catching bad guys (and I'm not caring for a limit there as I'm preferring a DoS by crashing the firewall over someone getting through unnoticed) and the counters for accounting (that's why I'd like to have some "read and reset" function so I can milk them without dripping too much). Achim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990727222033.A75086>