Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:56:34 +0200 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Locking Issue Message-ID: <op.tb934kbt8527sy@localhost> In-Reply-To: <44AB0C96.3090400@samsco.org> References: <20060704212432.GA57426@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <44AB0C96.3090400@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:49:26 +0200, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > Michel Talon wrote: > >>> BTW, I noticed yesterday that that IPv6 support committ to rpc.lockd >>> was never backed out. An immediate question for people experiencing >>> new rpc.lockd problems with 6.x should be whether or not backing out >>> that change helps. >> So it may be relevant to say that i have kernels without IPV6 support. >> Recall that i have absolutely no problem with the client in FreeBSD-6.1. >> Tomorrow i will test one of the 6.1 machines as a NFS server and the >> other as >> a client, and will make you know if i see something. >> As to the problems you mention about NFS Linux, yes i have seen a lot >> since >> years. But to my surprise FC5 seems to work well. By the way it is >> kernel >> 2.6.16 so sufficiently recent for the problems to have been ironed out, >> presumably. >> > > 2.6.16 should be OK. I've heard of problems with cookie and handle > sizes with it, but only under highly unusual circumstances. > > Scott Just for the record. I'm running a 6.1-STABLE client with a Debian 3.1 server with kernel 2.6.12 and that works ok with nfs locking. Locking didn't work in the past (6.0-STABLE). Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.tb934kbt8527sy>