Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 19:17:22 +0100 From: "Morten Seeberg" <morten@seeberg.dk> To: <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: -STABLE Message-ID: <038e01bf4016$2483f870$1600a8c0@SOS>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I´ve always been wondering a bit about how stable -STABLE really is?? I´ve always had the habit of installing the newest -STABLE, whenever I install a new BSD, but I think that often, i encounter more problemt with the -STABLE than with -RELEASE Can this really be true??? I feel like -STABLE is updated so fast, that noone has time to test the problems their correct. So, If I want a stable system, should I then install fx 3.3-RELEASE instead of 3.3-STABLE, and only upgrade if I have a specific advantage of the -STABLE branch?? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /\/\orten $eeberg, Systems Consultant @ Merkantildata - Enterprise Solutions #echo 'System Administrators suck :)' > /dev/console To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?038e01bf4016$2483f870$1600a8c0>