Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:22:22 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION
Message-ID:  <slrnfu1qau.21d2.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net>
References:  <200803122100.m2CL0t7V088955@freefall.freebsd.org> <slrnfthsg7.dgk.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> <20080313094356.GA9219@tin.it> <47DF72A3.4030502@yandex.ru> <47DF78AF.400@elischer.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Hi Julian Elischer! 

On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:09:19 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION':

>> About Vadim's prepositions:
>> 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in
>> tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we
>> should extend our current table argument to 64 bit.
> tables should be expanded to have different types of values..
> 32 but ints
> IP addresses (currently I'm overlaying it on 32 bit ints)
> IPV6 addresses.
> skipto locations
> byte limits..

Are you talking about tablearg-values (data), or keys too? And does that count
only IP addrs and integers of different sizes, or strings too?

-- 
WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181       mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru
[Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnfu1qau.21d2.vadim_nuclight>