Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:22:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION Message-ID: <slrnfu1qau.21d2.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> References: <200803122100.m2CL0t7V088955@freefall.freebsd.org> <slrnfthsg7.dgk.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> <20080313094356.GA9219@tin.it> <47DF72A3.4030502@yandex.ru> <47DF78AF.400@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Julian Elischer! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:09:19 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION': >> About Vadim's prepositions: >> 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in >> tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we >> should extend our current table argument to 64 bit. > tables should be expanded to have different types of values.. > 32 but ints > IP addresses (currently I'm overlaying it on 32 bit ints) > IPV6 addresses. > skipto locations > byte limits.. Are you talking about tablearg-values (data), or keys too? And does that count only IP addrs and integers of different sizes, or strings too? -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnfu1qau.21d2.vadim_nuclight>