From owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 26 20:00:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C43716A41C for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 20:00:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe09.swip.net [212.247.155.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C64743D4C for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 20:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-T2-Posting-ID: eKzDRnm/yLTWsjKJiVl6Rw== Received: from mp-217-203-14.daxnet.no ([193.217.203.14] verified) by mailfe09.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 166832745; Thu, 26 May 2005 21:53:17 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: hellmuth.michaelis@t-online.de Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:54:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20050526183150.D613D11876@bert.int.kts.org> In-Reply-To: <20050526183150.D613D11876@bert.int.kts.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505262154.01790.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Marcus Franke , freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Asterisk on FreeBSD + ISDN BRI X-BeenThere: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: hselasky@c2i.net List-Id: Using ISDN with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:00:22 -0000 On Thursday 26 May 2005 20:31, Hellmuth Michaelis wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > The only problem I see is that the official version of I4B doesn't > > support an alert phase: calls must be either accepted or rejected. > > Then have another look and you will find that alerting is supported. > Besides that i don't see this an item why it would not be possible > to get asterisk support for i4b. "/dev/i4b" supports alerting OK, but "/dev/i4btelXXX" doesn't. And if you want to get sound-data from a call, one has to do something similar to what "isdnphone" does, right? And then comes the problem "/dev/i4btelXXX" can only work as an answering machine or dial out. There is no "ringing" signal from "/dev/i4bteldXXX" so that "isdnphone" can decide whether to accept a call or not, and not just "isdnd". If one does it properly multiple configurations (cep's) in isdnd should be allowed to compete for a call. Then it should be possible to set up an answering machine in addition to "isdnphone". So it would have been nice if you could have had a look at my code to see how I implemented it, so that we don't end up incompatible. --HPS