From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Aug 19 17:32:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA09155 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:32:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA09146 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:32:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from bubble.didi.com (sji-ca10-63.ix.netcom.com [205.186.214.63]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA10805; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA01122; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:32:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199808200032.RAA01122@bubble.didi.com> To: jb@cimlogic.com.au CC: obrien@NUXI.com, giffunip@asme.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199808200018.KAA03932@cimlogic.com.au> (message from John Birrell on Thu, 20 Aug 1998 10:18:43 +1000 (EST)) Subject: Re: rayshade port From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * I have a working upgrade procedure for aout->elf that handles the world * and kernel, but ignores ports. Are people going to object if we ask for * ports to be deleted and installed from scratch on the newly converted * elf system? I can't see how I can possibly test building elf ports with * an unknown number of aout ones hanging around. There are too many * combinations. Oh, forgot to say, I do not expect you guys to test everything. Please throw the switch soon, so we can fix as much stuff as possible before the release. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message