From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 11:23:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F8F37B405 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 11:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9E943FA3 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 11:23:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id A64465308; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 20:23:40 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: csujun@21cn.com From: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:23:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030406105748.10644.qmail@web41808.mail.yahoo.com> (Jun Su's message of "Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:57:48 +0800 (CST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 References: <20030406105748.10644.qmail@web41808.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why not document load modules instead of recompiling kernel?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 18:23:45 -0000 Jun Su writes: > However, kldload ipfw also works. Why there isn;t any > words about this? Is loadable module not encourage?=20 The module is built without any options (such as logging), and there is no kld for divert sockets or dummynet. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@ofug.org