Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 19:25:10 -0800 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG>, tlambert@usr01.primenet.com (Terry Lambert) Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: We will mail 4 U Message-ID: <199711260325.TAA28621@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freebsd.org> "Re: We will mail 4 U" (Nov 25, 5:14pm)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 25, 5:14pm, "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote: } Subject: Re: We will mail 4 U } } two relay hosts were the ns servers for amgen.com. } why are nameservers configured to relay mail? <sigh> It appears they do double duty as firewall bastion hosts. Those two were filtering their incoming mail through smap from the TIS toolkit. ; <<>> DiG 2.0 <<>> amgen.com mx ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY , status: NOERROR, id: 6 ;; flags: qr rd ra ; Ques: 1, Ans: 4, Auth: 10, Addit: 11 ;; QUESTIONS: ;; amgen.com, type = MX, class = IN ;; ANSWERS: amgen.com. 85695 MX 0 ns2.amgen.com. amgen.com. 85695 MX 20 relay2.uu.net. amgen.com. 85695 MX 20 relay1.uu.net. amgen.com. 85695 MX 10 ns1.amgen.com. The other relays that I saw were: osmail.onesource.com and osmail2.onesource.com, both running sendmail 8.8.4 and 8.8.7 gate1.gateway.com running smap. --- Truck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711260325.TAA28621>