From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 13 21:28:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A637B401 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cecov.masternet.it (cecov.masternet.it [194.184.65.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C4943F85 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:28:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gmarco@masternet.it) Received: from lifebook.masternet.it (modem47.masternet.it [194.184.65.242]) by cecov.masternet.it (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5E4UxNb042295; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 06:31:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gmarco@masternet.it) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030614061832.00c5bbd0@194.184.65.7> X-Sender: gmarco@194.184.65.7 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 06:21:16 +0200 To: Bill Moran From: Gianmarco Giovannelli In-Reply-To: <3EE9CAFE.5000402@potentialtech.com> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030613061832.03bab008@194.184.65.7> <5.2.1.1.2.20030612202321.02e28008@194.184.65.4> <5.2.1.1.2.20030613061832.03bab008@194.184.65.7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Antivirus for (mailservers on) FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 04:28:46 -0000 At 09.00 13/06/2003 -0400, Bill Moran wrote: >>>I really like Sophos. McAffee also did a deal with Whistle/IBM >>>at one point, for doing this on the InterJet. I don't know if >>>they ever completed the code, or what happened with that. >>I am not looking for a simple antivirus but a very quick and fast, if >>possible, product specified for mailservers. > >Sophos products do this. mailmonitor ? otherwhise sweep is a general tool, not a one designed to be used directly by a mailserver. >>Sophos should use amavis, which usually loose some msg (you have to >>re-queue from time to time) :-). > >I have never seen this. Been running Amavis for over a year and never >had a complaint of lost messages. If you use amavis-perl and you check your /var/spool/mqueue (not /var/spool/mqamavis) you should find it plenty of msgs. Otherwhise I have to suppose that a lot of others persons like me have wrong configurations elsewhere... Btw I don't want to criticize amavis which is IMHO a very good alternative ...