Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:22:30 -0600 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> Cc: rotkap@gmx.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng - one "ervery day anoying" problem Message-ID: <5111B056.7050607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51101A38.40309@FreeBSD.org> References: <9ct4u9-1mu.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <CA%2Bt49PJ=0AObMWJQ=VCXC3AcdS3XkZf5DH5B6qrH=Kw2rgJT8Q@mail.gmail.com> <med5u9-mbo2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <51101A38.40309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2ACFLKKEGALFCIUENKSJK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/4/2013 2:29 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 04/02/2013 19:06, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Daniel Nebdal <dnebdal@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> You might want to look at this: >>> https://github.com/pkgtools/pkgtools/issues/44 >>> In the meantime, could you deinstall/reinstall libreoffice? No guaran= tees, >>> but maybe it'll clean things up. >> >> >> I did >> >> Does not solve the stale dependency - it is still there :( >=20 > Hi, Heino, >=20 > This is a bug in portupgrade's pkgng integration: the whole 'pkgdb -Fu'= > thing shouldn't be necessary with pkgng's built-in sqlite database. > Unfortunately the coding required to chop out the pkgdb related bits of= > portupgrade and replace them with equivalents via 'pkg check' isn't > complete. I believe it needs some changes to 'pkg check' too, although= > I have no details on that. Yup it's a combination of that. pkg-check needs a way to just list missing dependencies so portupgrade can fix it via ports. Portupgrade also should stop using a redundant pkgdb on top of pkg(8), but that is a bigger task I have not gotten to yet. >=20 > It's an annoying message, but inaccurate and you can just ignore it. > You can use 'pkg check' and 'pkg info' to verify that liberoffice has > the correct dependencies installed and that all those packages are > correctly installed. Pretty much yes, just making sure the dependencies are installed should fix it. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery bdrewery@freenode/EFNet ------enig2ACFLKKEGALFCIUENKSJK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJREbBWAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5tlwP/1nZUHApFv7xv6VYIFqriKGP LFJd2CGZY1xZy949FiRdnc1wOHHzGQRaDuIttGatW0bGIZbe19n6u1d+mqdg9s7Q 65f6gEKi+NRWOMRv5mffTcG9o9lXdwNSnH9OkK5wpLg2BsehMUSrBRtHB2YIlRxa Zf4E8OrWbX+0bBKMhWXqvBAhpkc04yUafREqnncNivlr2jWZWCxZM3KHybA7yDWh aJbGdrngnC7bt8LKaBwhhAHF7ungnyIV9EQ34q3NJExRfZaBc2LjeNuKLCFUfpQk FC5z9KXxDZOx0EXCsnEOy2kDOsjEpdZkx2fRxt61fqA+eQ/cQZj+S2Gwe1POLYSJ XWfW74GWXZnBmITCD9Dwc5RK1alFr5Azztp0bSJQBcPkMmYWy3FiMwuSMWOkixOO MuvBroPdrRF7Ug8aruDPoSSlAvE95+l8x2X75kEOF9zTNcYAWy97Dgxa5lzYsjs+ TQnNZyS+p9y8M0Qs522nMzBhK1OE0J07YZ4ct6Oq5EWdlb27oPytb5s6aYsmJvhw 6Zk9Du/j22jBVgVSFvNNTgDctbl2Gtkli5sbzbbWgpmFxM+jxdPF3bpp3DMhG/1V 0NZr0CumNkXEJURwn7n1V1/oYQ77q0jpRxbOFGAwnKKMe12bKemPwYD9bDLdjbp0 ZamwblhYSQWYcMVqO0zp =n58t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2ACFLKKEGALFCIUENKSJK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5111B056.7050607>