Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:27:43 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Harry Coin <harrycoin@qconline.com>, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: mss.c pcm fix to ' attach returned 6 ' load failure for v5.x acpi and up Message-ID: <200507121627.44317.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20050712150444.01fb8078@mail.qconline.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20050712134818.0202b0d0@mail.qconline.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20050712150444.01fb8078@mail.qconline.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 04:12 pm, Harry Coin wrote: > John, > > I am sincerely appreciative the time you have taken. Your test results > are below. > > I haven't processed everything you've written, but I'm not going to hold > you up waiting as that is going to take a while. > > The code just comments out the line you mentioned. pcm0 loads with ACPI on > in this case. I haven't tested what happens with ACPI off, and have no > easy way to test what will happen with the other non-pnp chips (or other > pnp chips) this driver supports. Ok, thanks. > I suggest you send a copy of your comments to whoever fixes up the > architecture manual, because of evident disagreement regarding best > practice in the isa non-pnp driver detection method (ISA_PNP_PROBE vs. > isa_get_logical_id). Well, I think I've just figured out why it says that (the ACPIxxxx devices), so it looks like I am going to have to go through and fix all the various drivers to use a probe routine if they attach to ACPI. It looks like several drivers attach to acpi that probably don't need to as well (ACPI only enumerates built-in hardware like COM ports, etc. It doesn't enumerate ISA PnP cards). -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507121627.44317.jhb>