Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:58:07 +0200 (MEST)
From:      Jan Stocker <Jan.Stocker@t-online.de>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        mi@aldan.algebra.com
Subject:   ports/40874: libfpx wont build / wrong CFLAGS
Message-ID:  <200207220858.g6M8w7Ir016392@twoflower.liebende.de>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         40874
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       libfpx wont build / wrong CFLAGS
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Jul 22 02:00:08 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Jan Stocker
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD twoflower 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Jul 18 08:40:25 CEST 2002 root@twoflower:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Twoflower50 i386
>Description:
The needed line 

#CFLAGS+=       -DHAVE_WCHAR_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1

is commented out, but port includes wchar.h, so we get a duplicate definition.

>How-To-Repeat:
make port on -current.

>Fix:
Uncomment line..... cant understand why it is commented... 
My 4.6 box and -current has wchar.h...

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207220858.g6M8w7Ir016392>