Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 03:07:03 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable Message-ID: <37FF8447.9BE11979@newsguy.com> References: <XFMail.991009132848.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews wrote: > > So, I say, leave it out of -STABLE until 4.0-CURRENT becomes -STABLE (probably > February-March 2000?). Vendors have plenty of time until then to reimplement > their suser()-dependent features. I heard march 2000, likely to slip. Alas, we need a stable newbus, and, if at all possible, devfs. Do you see that by march 2000? I don't. Going -stable on 4.x before newbus itself becomes stable would be an error. IMHO. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "I always feel generous when I'm in the inner circle of a conspiracy to subvert the world order and, with a small group of allies, just defeated an alien invasion. Maybe I should value myself a little more?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37FF8447.9BE11979>