Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 May 1998 13:00:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:      The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Travis Mikalson <bofh@terranova.net>
Cc:        Greg Rowe <greg@uswest.net>, am@f1.ru, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SCSI problems?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980511125657.756B-100000@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <35571882.43A9@terranova.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 May 1998, Travis Mikalson wrote:

> Greg Rowe wrote:
> > 
> > The 2940UW is revision E (rev 1) which won't handle any kind of load with the
> > current Adaptec code. We're going to test the CAM code with the Revision E's
> > this week to see if the problem still exists. (Verify this by running a number
> > of bonnie tests to be certain) You can either put a Revision D controller in
> > (rev 0) or drop the transfer rate in the SCSI setup to 10 MBS to fix the
> > problem.
> > 
> > Greg
> 

ahc0: <Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI host adapter> rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci0.11.0
ahc0: aic7880 Wide Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16 SCBs
ahc1: <Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI host adapter> rev 0x01 int a irq 11 on pci0.12.0
ahc1: aic7880 Wide Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16 SCBs


I have the above two controllers in this machine...am I correct in assuming 
that the 'rev 0x00' above is the Revision D controller?  


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980511125657.756B-100000>