Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:14:05 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOT_FOR_ARCHS considered harmful [was: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds.] Message-ID: <4f22db5d.IHCfc41SdSK3Lk6c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4F21A748.6010307@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F17DB1C.6080503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <CADLo83-WtVmyGHM=O4FbTNbDy9h=A1t111bP6eYc%2BTL8-RGmuA@mail.gmail.com> <4F193FD5.8070208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120121204614.GH4729@lonesome.com> <4F1BE7B4.6090702@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F21A748.6010307@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > Finally, all this testing the CPU architecture and the OS version > makes no sense at all for ports that don't install any compiled > binaries, such as shell scripts. Unless said script runs something CPU- or OSversion-specific, e.g. to perform operations that are supported only in recent geom, or to report on the configuration of ACPI or the new USB subsystem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4f22db5d.IHCfc41SdSK3Lk6c%perryh>