From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Apr  2 22:19:36 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA20850
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:19:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA20842
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA26552; Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:18:30 -0800 (PST)
To: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM>
cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: random traps 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 31 Mar 1996 15:59:25 CST."
             <199603312159.PAA26843@compound> 
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 1996 22:18:29 -0800
Message-ID: <26550.828512309@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> to my intuitive notion of OS quality.  So... I wonder whether the
> intuitive quality of FreeBSD might not be given a hand up by such a
> treatment...

Well, why not run it and send us the results?  All panics are taken
seriously..

					Jordan