Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:57:41 -0400 From: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org> Cc: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Subject: Re: sata raid & write cache state Message-ID: <16748.3333.136486.42182@canoe.dclg.ca> In-Reply-To: <20041012165029.GA86646@nargothrond.kdm.org> References: <b21e6cca041010181932879aeb@mail.gmail.com> <20041011043508.GA72113@nargothrond.kdm.org> <b21e6cca041011090816a1352@mail.gmail.com> <20041011210303.GA78436@nargothrond.kdm.org> <16747.63803.470649.921882@canoe.dclg.ca> <20041012165029.GA86646@nargothrond.kdm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Kenneth" == Kenneth D Merry <ken@freebsd.org> writes: Kenneth> e.g. from a quick look at Maxtor's site, the DiamondMax Plus Kenneth> 9 doesn't support queueing, and the DiamondMax 10 claims to Kenneth> support NCQ. I suppose the more important question is "do we support NCQ?", but I thought that there was another form of queueing that was mandatory in SATA. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16748.3333.136486.42182>