From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 03:18:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8316016A41C for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 03:18:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5927843D49 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 03:18:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7BEB2A35; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:18:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:18:05 -0500 To: Jon Passki Message-ID: <20050706031805.GA32638@soaustin.net> References: <20050706024714.20374.qmail@web50302.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050706024714.20374.qmail@web50302.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: udo.schweigert@siemens.com, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Tenable Commerical Registered Plugin Feed Licensing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 03:18:06 -0000 On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 07:47:13PM -0700, Jon Passki wrote: > Should this be marked RESTRICTED, MASTER_SITES be altered to only > go for nessus.org/tenablesecurity.com servers, or the project not > even worry about it? The latter is not an option. >From my reading they have two licenses for plugins: GPL and this ... "special" ... license. We (the project) need to change the following things on the latter ones: - The ports should be marked RESTRICTED; - The MASTER_SITES should be blank; - IGNORE needs to be set using similiar technology as in e.g. databases/msql Udo, please let us (portmgr@) know if this is something that you can take care of in a timely fashion, otherwise, we will look at it ourselves. To reiterate: the project cannot be in a position to ignore copyright and redistribution terms that software authors impose, no matter what our own feelings about those terms or the pre-existing status quo. mcl, with portmgr hat on