From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 12 09:45:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA06765 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (root@agora.rdrop.com [199.2.210.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA06760 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA05302 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wcCwO-0000L1-00; Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:41:40 -0700 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 09:41:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Josh Tiefenbach cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Berkeley DB v2.0 In-Reply-To: <19970612120819.60013@ican.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, Josh Tiefenbach wrote: > I noticed poking around Keith Bostic's web page that he has released db > v2.0.6. Has there been any nacsent thought to importing it into the tree, even > taking into account that the new package is not compatible at the binary level > with v1.85? > > According to the notes on the web page, sendmail 8.9 (whenever that's due) > will be using v2. > > (compiles cleanly under 2.2-STABLE in case anybody is wondering) > > josh > > -- > Josh Tiefenbach - Assistant Gopher - ACC TelEnterprises - josh@ican.net Not only are the db files not compatible, but the API has changed too. I suggest making db 2.0.6 a port. Tom