Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:07:02 -0300 From: Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: table with bug in ipfw Message-ID: <55B25496.1080308@bsdinfo.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20150724143103.GJ49099@home.opsec.eu> References: <555A8208.9010208@bsdinfo.com.br> <1442671432126620@web6h.yandex.ru> <55B24142.7090001@bsdinfo.com.br> <20150724141053.GH49099@home.opsec.eu> <20150724141153.GI49099@home.opsec.eu> <17501437747436@web25h.yandex.ru> <20150724143103.GJ49099@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24-07-2015 11:31, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> This one was fixed in r266310 (based on bin/189471) but I haven't >> merged it to -stable. > Because it changes ip_fw.h, would it break KABI or ABI ? > Would that prevent a merge to 10.2 ? > I do not know if it affects the rule or whether it is merely visual. But this bug has since version 10.0. I thought it would be corrected to version 10.2.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55B25496.1080308>